Pages

Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts

Friday, March 28, 2014

The "Proper" Artwork in Office Space

Is an office setting an appropriate place to hang nude artwork? I've been asked by a colleague why I don't hang my own artwork in the office -- I do have a few pieces up. I didn't answer him directly because I've done mostly figure drawings of nude models. I hesitate to hang any of these pieces in my office.

The question surfaced again, today. Someone stopped by my office and looked around my office environs. He asked if I was an artist. I am not a trained artist but I would say I am one. As a designer, I'm an artist. As a hobbyist, art in various forms is my delight. The conversation turned to art pieces and what I'd done. I gave a quick sweep to the two framed figure gestures I had propped on my desk.

"I don't have more up because some of them are figure drawings that might offend some people if I have them in my office," I said. "Do you think it's OK to hang them in my office?"

"Well, I didn't even notice them when I came in."

Suffice to say, I didn't get a direct answer to my question despite some more chatter about it. It is a touchy one. I wondered if I had posed an uncomfortable question to my office visitor. I came home, thought about the question and wondered about the implications of posing that question. Lightweight research reveals these findings:

1. An Admissions Office in a university had refused to hang such an art piece. 

2. It appears to be a controversial issue. At first glance, it seems to divide the art folks from the non-art folks. By that, I don't mean to marginalize or be divisive. I regard nude artwork as tasteful because of my own frame of reference. But other people might be offended because uncovering the human body in public is alien to most cultures, including mine.

3. There is no right answer. It depends. The question raises more questions about difference -- respect for difference in upbringing, definitions about what is considered beautiful, artistic, tasteful, degrees of realism in the nude artwork (the more realistic, the more uncomfortable some folks might be when confronted in public about it), sensitization to the nude human form (are the models in the nude or "naked"), some people's pretentiousness, etc.

I had asked a question that challenged an individual to think about his/her assumptions. It is provocative I admit. But people's response to whether it is OK to hang a nude artwork in a higher ed office setting that doesn't have high traffic volume helps me to learn quite a bit more about the respondent in a short time. And it is not information that puts anyone down.

P.S. I'd add that sometimes, we need to deploy some humor when confronted with these sorts of questions. 

Sunday, September 4, 2011

Whole Me's Mystery Theater and Spaghetti Dinner


"Whole Me Inc. is a 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization providing educational and social services designed to promote the success of Deaf and hard of hearing individuals, their families, and their communities." It works particularly with deaf and hard-of-hearing children to ensure their successful transition to adult life; this is done by establishing strong partnerships among key individuals in the child's life. Read more.

This coming Saturday, September 10, Whole Me will be hosting a spaghetti dinner and mystery theater. I can't wait to go! Check this out: https://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=108494662579738 

Saturday, February 5, 2011

ASL Interpreting: A Cognitively Complex Challenge

CNY-RID Meeting. Feb 4.
Six challenges now face ASL interpreters. These were outlined by Dr. Dennis Cokely (Director of the ASL interpretation program at Northeastern University) in the video presentation of the Region 1 Conference meeting at Albany, NY, "What's in your knapsack". Not sure if I have organized the 6 correctly as we couldn't see the slides and he didn't list them as he spoke.

1. Values. Have they been lost? Not all change is growth; not all movement is forward.What's the meaningful common cause?

2. Relationships. Pivotal changes occurred in (i) 1964, from "of the community" to "for the community"; (ii) 1973, from least privileged to most privileged through the enaction of the first of 3 major laws; (iii) 1990 IDEA; ADA. Laws mandated the presence of ASL interpreters and gave them a sense of privilege; an unearned mandated presence. (Check Peggy McIntosh's 1989 seminal article on "White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack").

The Rehab Act, IDEA and ADA made a profession out of ASL interpreting. It became a legal necessity, a business. The supply-demand imbalance also had the potential to turn this privilege into a conferred dominance. Some entity gave interpreters "control over the lives of the deaf" such that they don't get to go where they want to freely. Instead, the deaf now go where interpreters choose to work; interpreters' work preferences now constrain their lives. A love/hate relationship exists. This intrusive/systemic level of control, according to Harlan Lane (Northeastern University) renders the deaf the most oppressed group in the USA, and those who are deaf and blind, even more oppressed. The question to ASL interpreters: To what extent do we contribute to the oppression of deaf people? To what extent do their work choices, patterns of work and their interpretations affect them? (When the deaf is interpreted as "cannot hear", then the automatic interpretation of English words have the capacity to influence and perpetuate views of the social, educational and legal systems we enacted. How do we contribute to the path of least resistance?

Changing systems is hard, but several systems need changing. How do we work with the deaf to get access? What's our common cause? What's the greater cause? Are we self-focused or other-focused? Who controls our work? We need to find ways to rekindle our relationships with the deaf people and acknowledge our privilege.

3. Connections. Interpreters are increasingly disconnected from deaf people. Only 20% of interpreters belong to the NAD; 8% to State Associations of the Deaf. 49% of interpreters indicated that they have less than 10% interaction with deaf people. Bottom line: interpreters are not engaged with deaf people.

What is their connection with their peers/colleagues? Is it collaborative or competitive? What is the model of work? What is interpreters' basic orientation towards their colleagues? Is there respect for another person's interpretation?

Mentoring. "More interpreters want mentoring than are able to receive it, and less than a third of the organization’s members are willing to provide it" (Kent, 2010 blogpost).

4. Nature of work. In the past, there was no paid work; service was reciprocal. Now there is no pro bono work, interpreting now operates on a business model. Only 13% of interpreters work in the healthcare context; to 78% of the deaf, the healthcare setting is the single most important setting which they need interpreters to fill.

Education. Comparing education of interpreters and deaf: 50% of interpreters will go on to attain a MA/PhD in 10 years; a majority of the deaf leave high school with a 4th grade reading capability. 

Even with interpreting, deaf people's educational level and literacy rates are not increasing. Are interpreters complicit in this educational partnership? This partnership is apparently not working. Interpreters need to be more concerned with the level of service they are rendering. They need to rekindle the reciprocity in this relationship and contribute to the common good of interpreters and Deaf. There needs to be a significant effort to give back and to re-engage with deaf people. This legally mandated economic security is a privilege that should not be abused.
 
5. Who defines our work? What is the interpreter's work? A dial-tone; an assistive device; an auxiliary aid? Interpreting is one of the most cognitively complex task human beings are capable of, requiring cognitive and cultural capacities. To regulate and ensure ethical practices, RID has mandated the protection of its members. (There is reportedly abuse in the use of VRS as it robs the context of the communication). RID has to pay attention to how employers are treating interpreters: agency charges $69 but pays interpreters $38 an hour; agency charges $150 and pays interpreters $50 per hour. 289 million people in this country don't get it.

6. Competition. Certified vs. Not Certified. (Shades between this range) Tensions and conflict that come with this demarcation.

After the video presentation, there was active discussion on the issues raised by Cokely. To an outsider like me, it seems several things need investigation: more research and understanding into the nature of signing and development of appropriate training programs; competency levels; types of competencies, including cultural sensitivity and awareness; continuing education.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

In Defense of Culture

Image source: http://on.msnbc.com/fnXUgL
My heart breaks to read of the Egyptian looters and the irreparable damage they inflicted on the learning of future generations. Years and years of accumulated cultural heritage, lifeworlds and memories had disappeared in Iraq during the US-led invasion. And now, we face the same threat to the Egyptian cultural heritage. Why some people would do this is unthinkable to me. But well, many other things are unthinkable acts too. When emotions are not managed, and misguided decisions are made too quickly, we live with the consequences.

Read more here about the events:

The cultural heritage of a people, no matter how old -- Egyptian, Mesopotamian (Iraqi), or young, like Singapore, must be protected at all costs. The saddest victim in these conflicts is not the mere loss of history or artifacts, but the heritage and identity of a people. Sad.